Conservative Dentistry and Endodontic Journal

Register      Login

VOLUME 5 , ISSUE 2 ( July-December, 2020 ) > List of Articles


“Conservative Bonded Restoration (An Alternative to Full Coverage Crown): A Case Report on Endocrown

Beulah M Bejoy, Sethuparvathi Anitha, Josey Mathew, Sinju Paul

Citation Information : Bejoy BM, Anitha S, Mathew J, Paul S. “Conservative Bonded Restoration (An Alternative to Full Coverage Crown): A Case Report on Endocrown. Cons Dent Endod J 2020; 5 (2):42-47.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10048-0061

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 01-03-2021

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2020; The Author(s).


Background: The restoration of endodontically treated tooth (ETT) with substantial loss of the tooth structure is challenging as it carries a higher chance of biomechanical failure than vital tooth in restorative dentistry. Post combined with complete coverage restoration is a well-established technique to save such teeth from fracture, but it does not follow the minimal invasive principles of adhesive dentistry. Case description: This case report describes the management of endodontically treated mandibular premolar with lithium disilicate glass-ceramic endocrown (Emax). Conclusion: Endocrown is a feasible option for the restoration of extensively damaged posterior tooth after endodontic treatment. Since posterior teeth are vulnerable to tooth loss, endocrown, which is a single partial restoration, can be regarded as replacing a single crown with intraradicular retention.

  1. Restoration of the root treated tooth. In: Stock CJR, Gulabivala K, and Walker R, eds. Endodontics. 3rd ed., Elsevier; 2004. pp. 279–305.
  2. Intermittent loading of teeth with tapered, individually cast or prefabricated, parallel-sided posts. Int J Prosthodont 1992;5(3):257–261.
  3. Survival rate and failure characteristics for two post designs. J Prosthet Dent 1995;73(5):439–444. DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3913(05)80072-1.
  4. Effect of full coverage, endocrowns, onlays, inlays restorations on fracture resistance of endodontically treated molars. Int J Dent Oral Health 2015;5:2.
  5. Endocrowns: review. J Istanb Univ Fac Dent 2015;49(2):57–63. DOI: 10.17096/jiufd.71363.
  6. Clinical evaluation of adhesively placed Cerec Endo-crowns after 2 years—preliminary results. J Adhes Dent 1999;1(3):255–265.
  7. Restoration of the endodontically treated tooth. In: Hargreaves KM and Cohen S, eds. Cohen's Pathways of the Pulp. 10th ed., Elsevier Mosby; 2011. pp. 777–807.
  8. Restoring endodontically treated teeth with all ceramic endo-crowns case report. Stomatoloski Glasnik Srbije 2008;55(1):54–64. DOI: 10.2298/SGS0801054V.
  9. Endocrown preparation: review. Int J Appl Dent Sci 2019;5(1):253–256.
  10. Infiltração marginal apical relacionada ao tipo de cimento obturador e técnica de obturação. Rev Fac Odontol Lins 2004;16(2):7–12.
  11. Endocrown: an alternative approach for restoring endodontically treated molars with large coronal destruction. Case Rep Dent 2018;2018:1581952. DOI: 10.1155/2018/1581952.
  12. “Endocrown”: a reliable alternative to restorate RCT molar. Two case reports. Adv Dent Oral Health 2018;9(5):555774.
  13. Fracture resistance and failure modes of CEREC endo-crowns and conventional post and core-supported CEREC crowns. J Dent Sci 2009:4(3):110–117. DOI: 10.1016/S1991-7902(09)60016-7.
  14. Long-term survival of endodontically treated molars without crown coverage: a retrospective cohort study. J Prosthet Dent 2005;93(2):164–170. DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2004.11.001.
  15. Restoration of the endodontically treated posterior tooth. G Ital Endod 2014;28(1):2–16. DOI: 10.1016/j.gien.2014.05.007.
  16. Reconstruction of endodontically treated posterior teeth—with or without post? Guidelines for the dental practitioner. Eur J Esthet Dent 2009;4(4):312–327.
  17. A four to six year follow-up of indirect resin composite inlays/onlays. Acta Odontol Scand 2003;61(4):247–251. DOI: 10.1080/00016350310004557.
  18. Fabrication of a metal-free ceramic restoration utilizing the monobloc technique. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent 1995;7(5):83–94.
  19. Comparison of fracture strength of endocrowns and glass fiber post-retained conventional crowns. Oper Dent 2012;37(2):130–136. DOI: 10.2341/11-105-L.
  20. No post-no core approach to restore severely damaged posterior teeth: an up to 10-year retrospective study of documented endocrown cases. J Dent 2017;63:1–7. DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2017.04.009.
  21. The endocrown: a different type of all-ceramic reconstruction for molars. J Can Dent Assoc 2013;79:d140.
  22. Effect of intracoronal depth of teeth restored with endocrowns on fracture resistance: in vitro and 3-dimensional finite element analysis. J Endod 2018;44(7):1179–1185. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2018.04.008.
  23. Ceramic dental biomaterials and CAD/CAM technology: state of the art. J Prosthodont Res 2014;58(4):208–216. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpor.2014.07.003.
  24. Fracture resistance and failure modes of polymer infiltrated ceramic endocrown restorations with variations in margin design and occlusal thickness. J Prosthodont Res 2018;62(3):293–297. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpor.2017.11.003.
  25. Endocrown: conservative treatment modality for restoration of endodontically treated teeth—a case report. Endodontology 2015;27(2):188–191.
  26. Monolithic and bi-layer CAD/CAM lithium–disilicate versus metal–ceramic fixed dental prostheses: Comparison of fracture loads and failure modes after fatigue. Clin Oral Investig 2013;17(5):1407–1413. DOI: 10.1007/s00784-012-0830-1.
  27. Endocrown restorations for extensively damaged posterior teeth: clinical performance of three cases. Restor Dent Endod 2018;43(4):e38. DOI: 10.5395/rde.2018.43.e38.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.