Conservative Dentistry and Endodontic Journal

Register      Login

VOLUME 5 , ISSUE 2 ( July-December, 2020 ) > List of Articles

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Comparative Evaluation of Depth of Cure between Two Bulk-fill Composites and a Conventional Resin Composite: An In Vitro Study

Meera Bastian, RV Vineet, Josey Mathew, Liza George, Sinju Paul, Tom P Varghese

Keywords : Bulk-fill composites, Conventional composite, Depth of cure, Polymerization shrinkage

Citation Information : Bastian M, Vineet R, Mathew J, George L, Paul S, Varghese TP. Comparative Evaluation of Depth of Cure between Two Bulk-fill Composites and a Conventional Resin Composite: An In Vitro Study. Cons Dent Endod J 2020; 5 (2):23-27.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10048-0063

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 04-03-2021

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2020; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Abstract

Aim and objective: To evaluate and compare the depth of cure of two bulk-fill composites with a conventional composite. Materials and methods: A sample size of 36 was taken and divided into three groups based on the type of composite. Standardized cylindrical stainless steel molds were prepared with 8 mm diameter and 10 mm depth. Measurement of depth of cure by the scraping method was performed according to the ISO 4049 (2009). After placing the specimens, the mold was pressed with polyester strips covered by glass slides and curing was initiated using Bluephase 20i (Ivoclar Vivadent US) light-curing unit through the glass slide. Immediately after curing, the specimens were removed from the mold and the uncured part of the specimens was removed by scraping with a plastic spatula. The absolute length of the hardened composite specimen was measured using a digital vernier caliper. The measured length was divided by two and recorded as the ISO depth of cure. Results: The depth of cure of the composite specimens was found to be higher for Voco Xtra Fil bulk-fill composite than for Shofu Beautifil bulk-fill composite and Filtek Z350 XT conventional composite (3M/ESPE). Conclusion: Within the limitations of the study, it can be concluded that the placement of bulk-fill composites with 3-mm increments is mandatory for complete curing. Clinical significance: Depth of cure of bulk-fill composites determines the adaptation of restoration to the tooth structure, and this study aims to evaluate two newly introduced bulk-fill composites using scrape test.


PDF Share
  1. van de Sande FH, Moraes RR, Elias RV, et al. Is composite repair suitable for anterior restorations? A long-term practice-based clinical study. Clin Oral Investig 2019;23(6):2795–2803. DOI: 10.1007/s00784-018-2722-5.
  2. Ibarra ET, Lien W, Casey J, et al. Physical properties of a new sonically placed composite resin restorative material. Gen Dent 2015;63(3): 51–56.
  3. Calheiros FC, Pfeifer CS, Brandão LL, et al. Flexural properties of resin composites: Influence of specimen dimensions and storage conditions. Dent Mater J 2013;32(2):228–232. DOI: 10.4012/dmj. 2012-271.
  4. Anusavice KJ. In: Anusavice KJ, editor. Phillip's science of dental materials, 11th ed. St. Louis: Saunders Co; 2003. p. 655–719.
  5. Ilie N, Bucuta S, Draenert M. Bulk-fill resin-based composites: an in vitro assessment of their mechanical performance. Oper Dent 2013;38(6):618–625. DOI: 10.2341/12-395-L.
  6. Guney T, Yazici AR. 24-Month clinical evaluation of different bulk-fill restorative resins in class II restorations. Oper Dent 2020;45(2): 123–133. DOI: 10.2341/18-144-C.
  7. Kaisarly D, El Gezawi M, Keßler A, et al. Shrinkage vectors in flowable bulk-fill and conventional composites: bulk versus incremental application. Clin Oral Investig 2020:1–3. DOI: 10.1007/s00784-020-03412-3.
  8. Rauber GB, Bernardon JK, Vieira LC, et al. In vitro fatigue resistance of teeth restored with bulk fill versus conventional composite resin. Braz Dent J 27(4):452–457. DOI: 10.1590/0103-6440201600836.
  9. Van Ende A, De Munck J, Lise DP, et al. Bulk-fill composites: a review of the current literature. J Adhes Dent 2017;19(2):95–109. DOI: 10.3290/j.jad.a38141.
  10. Moharam LM, El-Hoshy AZ, Abou-Elenein K. The effect of different insertion techniques on the depth of cure and vickers surface micro-hardness of two bulk-fill resin composite materials. J Clin Exp Dent 2017;9(2):e266–e271. DOI: 10.4317/jced.53356.
  11. Yap AU, Pandya M, Toh WS. Depth of cure of contemporary bulk-fill resin-based composites. Dent Mater J 2016;31;35(3):503–510. DOI: 10.4012/dmj.2015-402.
  12. Benetti AR, Havndrup-Pedersen C, Honoré D, et al. Bulk-fill resin composites: polymerization contraction, depth of cure, and gap formation. Oper Dent 2015;40(2):190–200. DOI: 10.2341/13-324-L.
  13. Aravamudhan K, Rakowski D, Fan PL. Variation of depth of cure and intensity with distance using LED curing lights. Dent Mater 2006;22(11):988–994. Epub 2006. DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2005. 11.031.
  14. Rizzante FA, Duque JA, Duarte MA, et al. Polymerization shrinkage, microhardness and depth of cure of bulk fill resin composites. Dent Mater J 2019;38(3):403–410. DOI: 10.4012/dmj.2018-063.
  15. Moore BK, Platt JA, Borges G, et al. Depth of cure of dental resin composites: ISO 4049 depth and microhardness of types of materials and shades. Oper Dent 2008;33(4):408–412. DOI: 10.2341/07-104.
  16. de Cássia Romano B, Soto-Montero J, Rueggeberg FA, et al. Effects of extending duration of exposure to curing light and different measurement methods on depth-of-cure analyses of conventional and bulk-fill composites. Eur J Oral Sci 2020;128(4):336–344. DOI: 10.1111/eos.12703.
  17. Lindberg A, Peutzfeldt A, van Dijken JW. Effect of power density of curing unit, exposure duration, and light guide distance on composite depth of cure. Clin Oral Investig 2005;9(2):71–76. DOI: 10.1007/s00784-005-0312-9.
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.