The analysis of mechanical preparations in extracted teeth using protaper rotary instruments: value of the safety quotient. J Endod 2003 Sep;29(9):567-575.
Effectiveness of different final irrigant protocols on smear layer removal in curved canals. J Endod 2010 Aug;36(8):1361-1366.
The magic of mastering the glidepath: what every endodontist should know. Paper presented at American Association of Endodontists Annual Session 2010, San Diego, California. 2010.
Importance of patency in endodontics. Endodontology 2010;22:85-91.
Mechanical root canal preparation with NiTi rotary instruments: rationale, performance and safety. Am J Dent 2001 Oct;14(5):324-333.
The effect of pre- flaring on the rates of separation for 0.04 taper nickeltitanium rotary instruments. J Endod 2002 Jul;28(7):543-545.
Current developments in rotary root canal instrument technology and clinical use: a review. Quintessence Int 2010 Jun;41(6):479-488.
The principles of techniques for cleaning root canals. Aust Dent J 2007 Mar;52(Suppl 1):S52-S63.
The endodontic glide path: “Secret to rotary safety”. Dent Today 2010 Sep;29(9):86, 88, 90-93.
Pulp stones: a review. Int Endod J 2008 Jun;41(6):457-468.
Manual or Rotary Glide Path? Paper presented to the tenth annual meeting of The Academy of Microscope Enhanced Dentistry, foundations and Expansion virtual meeting, 10-12 Nov 2011.;2011. pp. 10-11.
Influence of manual preflaring and torque on the failure rate of ProTaper instruments. J Endod 2004 Apr;30(4):228-230.
Root canal anatomy preservation of WaveOne reciprocating files with or without glide path. J Endod 2012 Jan;38(1):101-104.
Endodontic predictability — “Restore or remove: how do I choose?” In: Cohen M, editor. Interdisciplinary treatment planning: principles, design, implementation. Chicago (IL): Quintesssence Publishing Co; 2008. pp. 123-164.
Instruments, materials and devices. In: Cohen S, Burns RC, editors. Pathways of pulp. 8th ed. St. Louis (MO): Mosby; 2002. pp. 521-572.